Welcome to the Tiki Central 2.0 Beta. Read the announcement
Celebrating classic and modern Polynesian Pop

Tiki Central / General Tiki / save our tiki history

Post #267179 by Dr.TikiMojo on Thu, Nov 16, 2006 2:16 PM

You are viewing a single post. Click here to view the post in context.

On 2006-11-15 12:32, Dr.TikiMojo wrote:
This means, (for US and ONLY within our city and codes),

This is "exactly" the way the rules/laws apply in OUR City.
I apologize if I made that a more "blanket" statement but I do "believe" it holds true anywhere you find a Preservation Law on the books.

I will clarify. I am not a lawyer, a trained historian or a master of research in general, nor a politician.

I only got involved with Historical Preservation when my wife and I bought our Victorian 3 years ago. I served on a City Board for revitalizing downtown Vallejo for nearly 7 years.

It has already been stated on this post that often local City Heritage laws can be more stringent than Federal Laws.

What I have stated is based on OUR city and what I've found within the Historical Preservation Society, (or my "understanding" of it right or wrong).

There is no Tiki in the City of Vallejo, nor the County of Solano. I am trying to get people to do their own research within their own communities that DO POSSESS a Historical or Important Tiki Location to get involved before they are no longer.

I will do what ever I can from where I'm at to help those who are interested.